THEM AND US

"It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things."(TP)

Since beginning of the conflict in Crimea it was always like this – THEM and US. ‘THEM’ were Russians and Ukrainians, some silly rebels, democratic rights of Russians and drawing parallels with Scots who also want their independence from UK.

US, of course, was the Western world. And, like UK intelligence suggested to Cameron, it's not worth starting World War Three over Ukraine. You see, it’s THEM, not US.

It all changed on 17 July, when flight MH17 from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, travelling over the conflict-hit region, crashed, hit by a messile. Soon suspicions started to grow that plane was shoot down by so called pro-Russian militants, i.e. „seperatists”.
A total of 283 passengers, including 80 children, and 15 crew members perished - 193 Dutch nationals (including one with dual US nationality), 43 Malaysians (including 15 crew), 27 Australians, 12 Indonesians and 10 Britons (including one with dual South African citizenship), 4 Germans, 4 Belgians, 3 Filipinos, one Canadian and one New Zealander on board.
Suddenly the whole world changed. It wasn’t THEM anymore, it was US. It wasn’t about pro-Russians killing Ukrainians and otherwise, it’s about THEM killing US. And finally it’s worth paying attention! Cynical? Hell, yes! Real politics? Sadly, yes.
Rebels, hitting the Western passenger plane, did the worst for themselves.  estern authorities now are coming out with all sorts of evidence about Russia’s direct support to so called rebels in Ukraine. Evidence of serious weapons being shifted out from Russia to rebels suddenly are out on the table. It’s harder and harder for Putin to deny Russia’s involvement in the conflict.   
What will happen next? I don’t know. Mr. Putin has fanned Russian sentiment in Ukraine and back at home, and now is under pressure from his own people inside Russia to do more to help rebels. Crimea was a quick and easy bite, and Russia loves winners. Backing out of conflict right now would mean a complete personal defeat for Putin. Declaring openly a war on Ukraine? Even crazier possibility. So let’s see.  

Finally! The first step!

Finally the first step into the right direction! HERE!!!!!

European Union has signed partnership agreements with Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova. 

On the other hand, Putin, who said that making Ukraine choose between Russia and the EU would split it in two, might be right here as this might escalate the rebel actions in the East Ukraine. 

NATO vs cheap energy

Well, here we go. According to this piece, Russia is following its dream scenario trying to persuade Baltic states to leave NATO in exchange for cheaper oil or gas.

 

Ukraine is NOT a member of NATO, so there is no legal reason for Western allies protect it against Russia’s attempts while Baltic states are members of NATO and thus can’t be messed with. As it works out Russia has had a thought about it and here it is – the solution – a deal! Russia is offering cheaper gas! Brilliant, isn’t it? Who will not jump at such opportunity?

As impossible as it seems, the silly little precedent is already there - Hungary on Monday approved a multi-billion-euro loan from Russia for an upgrade of the country’s only nuclear power plant, which will increase Hungary’s dependence on Moscow dramatically.

Sometimes I truly wonder how shortsaigthed ones can be in Brussels? Does EU really wants its members to be tied in deals like this right now with a country which by all means is acting like Devil’s empire again? While unsettled blood is still pouring in Ukraine?

About possibility Baltics accepting the Russian offer... It depends. The current generation of politics in Baltics had been born and lived under Soviet Sun so there is always a possibility of blackmail on top of legal way pro-Russian parties taking over at the next elections which is rather possible. Back into the UdSSR?

Looks a bit more than just an ethnic unrest

According to the piece, published in Washington Post, Russia's interests in Ukraine are much more serious than just overwhelming desire to protect the poor Russians there.


I actually recommend the opinion of Lilia Shevtsova for an insight.

Just like all of his predecessors, Putin supports the empire. Just like them, he probably believes that Russia can survive only as an empire rather than as a normal nation state.

According to Shevtsova, postmodern Europe, with its emphasis on treaties, soft power, and negotiations, has proven utterly feckless when it comes to bringing the Kremlin to heel.

The Russian elite is plugged into the Western economy and its financial system. That is why the West is helpless when it comes to containing Russia. So far, the Western governments haven’t shown any willingness to inflict financial or other kind of pain on themselves.

Only 15% Voted For Annexation in Crimea

According to  this piece in Forbes, only 15% of voters in Crimea voted for annexation.


Official Kremlin results: 97% for annexation, turnout 83 percent, and percent of Crimeans voting in favor 82%.

President’s Human Rights Council results: 50% for annexation, turnout 30%, percent of Crimeans voting in favor 15%.

46 dead in Odessa

46* (unofficial data so far) have been killed and about 200 injured yesterday in a fire in an official building in the city of Odessa in south-west Ukraine. 


Things are getting worse in Ukraine. Early Friday, pro-Russian militants shot down two Ukrainian attack helicopters and a third one, carrying medics... with shoulder-fired missile launchers!

I would not have problem with pro-Russians, clashing, throwing homemade Molotovs, building barricades and protecting their point of view. Okay, let's throw few hunting guns in the mixture. But shoulder-fired missile launchers? I don't have any of that sort stored under my bed. And you?

 Who will stop all this bedlam and when? Aren't you scared how fragile and vulnerable the peace of post-war Europe had been despite all the treaties, unions and agreements?

U.S. is waiting for German Chancellor Angela Merkel to persuade  Europeans to take a firmer stand against Russia, but, as usual, EU is unable to make any decission. What's left? Only NATO.

NATO pledged in a 1997 cooperation agreement with Russia that it wouldn’t station “substantial combat forces” in central and eastern Europe. But now the crisis in Ukraine is pulling it back to the mission that led to its creation 65 years ago: defending Europe’s eastern rim against Kremlin expansionism. 

Soo.... The Cold War is back? Or we shall see escalation, leading to something far worse?

CUTE!

This is so damn cute! Just read it!

New order? New challenge?

The first American troops arrived in Poland on Wednesday

Since Geneva agreement it has been few relatively calm days to sit and think about what exactly happened so far.

Nothing much, to be honest. Ukraine only lost Crimea. A big deal?

According to piece of Paul Goble, it is a rather big deal, especially for people in Crimea. Or actually not?At least for the West. British intelligence chiefs have warned Prime Minister David Cameron already not to step in as "it’s not worth starting World War Three over Ukraine." And it all seems exactly like that - nobody wants to step in to offer a helping hand to Ukraine. Because it's just Ukraine.

Maybe Ukraine is really not worth anything, but how about NATO allies? More and more experts points towards Baltic and especially Latvia as possible next target for Russia to excercise it's new war technology, based not on tanks but democracy which actually makes NATO's Article Five, on whose  Latvians rely, useless.

Goble (who's expertise on Russia had been proven by years) is quite categorically about Latvia as the next target. And while few question that NATO would respond to an overt Russian military move into Latvia or any other NATO member country, the Western defense alliance is not designed to counter the kind of subversion that Moscow has already used in Ukraine and that it could deploy in Latvia to undermine that country’s independence and test the alliance as well without using tanks, to cross the border. 
Fun, isn't it? 

ARE WE DOOMED?

It feels like we all are doomed already.  We are trapped in the situation when if we do, we are doomed, and if we don’t, we are doomed, too. I really feel for the Ukrainian soldiers yesterday when they approached Kramatorsk and were facing dilemma – to surrender or start firing at civilians who were used by pro-Russian separatists as a live shield.  It was the exact situation we all are facing right now. 

If the Western allies will join to help Ukraine to resist Russia’s attempts, there is a great danger of triggering a military escalation on a much larger scale - well, let’s use the exact word – WAR - right in the middle of Europe.  Just imagine – Russia would need just few nukes to change the whole picture in densely populated Europe forever. 

If the Western allies will decide not to protect Ukraine, Russia without a hesitation will reach for the next bite which, most likely will be the Baltic States (who, unlike Ukraine, are EU and NATO members). In that case Russia will destroy the whole political order which had been established after the WWII in the West, destroying the whole idea of unions like EU and NATO.

Tough decision, isn’t it? 

On a personal note, as one who went through the whole fun of Soviet collapse in the Baltic States twenty five years ago, I’m paralysed with fear right now. Each time when one political analyst or another points that the next Russia’s target, most likely, will be the Baltic States, I shiver. 

There is no way for me “back in the USSR” again. We rushed to join EU and NATO as fast as possible not because we truly wanted to join EU, and even less NATO, but it was our only hope to run away safely from the Russia’s “welcome back” party. We believed that we shall be safe then. It seems now that it was just another naive illusion because right now the whole Western alliance looks so incapable and weak to make any decisions.

Is there any hope at all?

Sorry, Ukraine!

So, European Union foreign ministers met today in Luxembourg, and agreed “to expand the list of Russian officials targeted by an asset freeze and travel ban”. According to unofficial info, there are only four new names on this list which will be revealed tomorrow. Four names! Only four names were added to the current list!

That’s all? What???

Currently, only 33 Russian officials and lawmakers are on the asset-freeze and travel-ban list. EU, after a long head scratching, will add four more. Do they really believe that such sanctions mean anything to Russia? How naive! Or – which is most likely to be the case – how cynical is this approach pretending to do something without doing anything.

But even such a minute step seemed too much for some EU members. Frans Timmermans, the Dutch foreign minister, said that it was too early to impose more sanctions, but that the EU should be prepared. (Prepared for what exactly?) 

Okay, okay, they also agreed the bloc's leaders COULD meet next week to further ratchet up pressure, and expressed hope that a meeting of foreign ministers of Ukraine, Russia, the EU and the U.S. on Thursday in Geneva will make real progress in scaling back tensions between Moscow and Kiev. 

What EU hopes for? That Russians will suddenly offer Ukraine an apology and return Crimea? Or that arrival of John Kerry will scare Russia to death?

According to French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, ‘it is the position of France, it is the position of Europe, to increase the pressure without making dialogue impossible.’ In other words – to pretend doing something without actually doing anything. 

EU foreign ministers also passed a few proposals – grant up to 1 billion euros in loans to cover Ukraine's critical balance of payments  and also agreed temporarily abolish or reduce customs duties on Ukrainian imports which might save Ukrainian exporters almost 500 million euros a year. Nice proposals, of course, but will it stop Russia? 

Already a month ago German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned Moscow of possible economic sanctions if the crisis escalates. Back then it was only Crimea. Now, a month later the situation without a doubt have had escalated into something much more ugly but promised economical sanctions still hadn’t been even discussed yet. 

US also is not so keen on actions. White House spokesman Jay Carney made clear that the United States was not considering lethal aid for Ukraine. "We're not actively considering lethal aid but we are reviewing the kinds of assistance we can provide," Carney said. "We are looking at a variety of ways to demonstrate our strong support for Ukraine including diplomatically and economically." 

Saakasvili few days ago mentioned words, told by Winston Churchill to Hitler's appeasers: "You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor and you will have war." 

Few years ago Russia snapped part of Georgia, and the West did nothing. Now Russia snapped Crimea and again – West did nothing. Now unstoppable Russian fingers are reaching for East Ukraine. 

Surely, we cannot expect modern-day politicians, obsessed with polls and midterm elections, to follow Churchill’s position all the time. „But at a minimum they should not want to go down in history as the Neville Chamberlains of the 21st century,” points Saakasvili. 
 
Seems that West has decided. To do nothing. Sorry, Ukraine!